California lawmakers are proposing legislation that would require 3D printer manufacturers to use a state-certified algorithm to block print jobs that produce prohibited firearm parts. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is opposing the bill, arguing that it would effectively sideline open source tools and create new surveillance concerns for users. EFF advocates claim that such legislation could lead to widespread surveillance of users' printing activity, potentially resulting in copyright lawsuits if data is shared with other companies.
The bill, AB 2047, aims to require 3D printer manufacturers to use a state-certified algorithm to check digital design files for firearm components and block print jobs. However, EFF argues that this would establish legal and illegal software, pushing consumers towards proprietary options and away from open source alternatives. They also claim that the algorithms are technically infeasible and would lead to false positives, preventing good-faith users from using their hardware.
Gun Owners of California opposes the bill as well, arguing that it targets innocent consumers and businesses rather than criminals. The EFF's concerns center around the potential for widespread surveillance and restrictions on consumer choice. Meanwhile, 3D printing companies like Prusa Research are keeping a close eye on developments, emphasizing the importance of open source principles and the "right to repair."
